United Parcel Service announced its Driver Choice Program on January 27, 2026, offering a $150,000 lump-sum payment to all 105,000 eligible full-time U.S. drivers in exchange for resigning permanently and waiving all rights to union representation. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which represents approximately 347,000 UPS workers under a national contract ratified in September 2023, called the program an illegal end-run around that contract and filed for an emergency restraining order in federal court on February 9, 2026.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts. Chief Judge Denise J. Casper denied the Teamsters’ request for a preliminary injunction on February 23, 2026, ruling that the union had not shown irreparable harm because the contract’s arbitration process offered an adequate remedy. The case then shifted to grievance arbitration, union pressure in 13 central states forced UPS to temporarily withdraw the program there in March, and the two sides reached a negotiated settlement on April 5, 2026 — capping buyouts at 7,500 drivers and requiring seniority to govern approvals.
- What: The Teamsters sued UPS to block the Driver Choice Program — a $150,000 voluntary separation offer to all full-time drivers — alleging at least six violations of the 2023 National Master Agreement.
- Who: International Brotherhood of Teamsters versus United Parcel Service, filed in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts.
- Status: Settled April 5, 2026. UPS capped buyouts at 7,500 drivers, agreed seniority governs approvals, and committed to no additional severance programs before the contract expires in 2028. DVSP arbitration over 2025 violations is ongoing.
- Injuries: Alleged loss of union bargaining rights, erosion of employment security guarantees, direct dealing with workers outside the collective bargaining process, and elimination of union jobs UPS was contractually obligated to maintain.
- Settlement: 7,500-driver cap on Driver Choice Program at $150,000 per driver; seniority governs; no new severance programs through 2028.
- Eligibility: Full-time UPS package car drivers and long-haul feeder drivers. Accepting the buyout means permanently foregoing UPS employment, union representation, and career benefits.
- Key date: Settlement reached April 5, 2026. DVSP grievance arbitration scheduled for May 2026.
UPS Driver Buyouts Lawsuit Timeline and Updates
January 2025 — UPS Announces Network Reconfiguration and Amazon Volume Cut
United Parcel Service opened 2025 with a major strategic announcement: it had reached an agreement with its largest customer, Amazon, to reduce its delivery volume for that customer by more than 50% by the second half of 2026. UPS CEO Carol Tomé framed the move as a deliberate pivot away from low-margin parcel delivery toward higher-value logistics services. She described it as part of “the largest network reconfiguration in UPS history.”
The operational consequences were immediate and sweeping. UPS expected to reduce its workforce by approximately 20,000 positions in 2025 alone, close up to 10% of its buildings, and reduce both its vehicle and aircraft fleets. The company projected $3.5 billion in total structural cost savings from its Network Reconfiguration program, with 35% of those savings tied to workforce reductions. The 2023 labor negotiations with the Teamsters — which produced the current National Master Agreement — were cited by the company as a contributing factor to the volume loss, since the contract’s labor cost increases made the company less competitive on Amazon’s preferred carrier roster.
July 2025 — First Buyout: Driver Voluntary Separation Program (DVSP)
On July 18, 2025, UPS announced its first voluntary buyout program for drivers, the Driver Voluntary Separation Program, open to full-time drivers with at least 25 years of service. The DVSP offered $1,800 per year of service with a minimum payout of $10,000. A 27-year veteran could receive $48,600; a driver with exactly 25 years would receive $45,000.
The offer was nearly universally rejected by the workforce. Drivers across the country filmed themselves shredding the offer letters or burning them — videos that spread rapidly on social media and became a symbol of rank-and-file resistance. The Teamsters publicly urged workers to reject the offer, calling it “insulting” and an attempt by UPS to offload higher-paid senior workers to cut costs while boosting stock buybacks. Approximately 3,000 of the 115,000 eligible drivers accepted — a take rate below 3%. By the time UPS reported Q3 2025 earnings in October, it had eliminated approximately 34,000 total positions and closed 93 buildings. About 90% of the drivers who accepted the DVSP exited on August 31, 2025.
Multiple Teamsters local unions filed grievances against UPS over the DVSP, alleging it violated provisions of the 2023 National Master Agreement. Those grievances were referred to the National Grievance Committee for a hearing before proceeding to binding arbitration, with the arbitration session ultimately scheduled for May 2026.
October 2025 — UPS Announces 30,000 More Job Cuts
During its Q4 2025 earnings call, UPS announced an additional 30,000 job reductions as part of the second phase of its restructuring. CFO Brian Dykes told analysts the company expected to offer a second voluntary separation program for full-time drivers to achieve the headcount reductions. He said the reductions would be accomplished through attrition, not involuntary layoffs. At the same time, UPS separately disclosed plans to eliminate 48,000 positions across operations and management — a figure that combined the new driver-facing reductions with broader salaried workforce cuts. The total workforce reduction target across the restructuring had grown to approximately 64,000 full-time positions over two years.
January 27, 2026 — UPS Announces Driver Choice Program Without Union Consultation
UPS announced the Driver Choice Program on January 27, 2026. Unlike the DVSP, which targeted senior drivers with a service-based payout, the DCP offered a flat $150,000 to all full-time drivers regardless of tenure — meaning a driver with two years of service would receive the same as a driver with 30. The program was open to approximately 105,000 eligible full-time package car drivers and long-haul feeder drivers.
The Teamsters immediately flagged the announcement as a surprise. The union said UPS CEO Carol Tomé and other corporate executives had developed the DCP behind closed doors and made no attempt to notify or negotiate with the union despite the 2023 contract’s requirements for consultation on programs affecting employment status. Between late January and the date of the lawsuit, the Teamsters issued more than 57 formal requests for information and documents related to UPS’s plans for the program. UPS ignored them.
February 6, 2026 — Teamsters File National Grievance Over DCP
On February 6, 2026, the Teamsters filed a formal grievance through the National Master Agreement’s grievance process, alleging the Driver Choice Program violated multiple provisions of the contract. The grievance listed the specific violations that would later form the core of the federal lawsuit. UPS responded that it disagreed with the union’s position, that it was following the grievance process specified in the contract, and that if the dispute could not be resolved the union had the right to demand arbitration. UPS also claimed it had offered to bargain over the DCP and never received a response — a claim the union vigorously disputed.
February 9, 2026 — Teamsters File Emergency Lawsuit in Federal Court
Three days after filing the grievance, the Teamsters filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The union cited at least six specific violations of the National Master Agreement in its court filings.
- Direct dealing: UPS negotiated new terms — the separation letter and payout — directly with individual workers, bypassing the union as the exclusive bargaining representative.
- Job elimination: UPS contractually agreed to maintain and establish a certain number of driver positions; the DCP eliminates those jobs outside the agreed process.
- Shop steward rights: The buyout program erodes the rights and privileges of union shop stewards, whose role includes advising members about accepting or rejecting any management offer.
- Irrevocable separation letters: The DCP required participating drivers to sign an irrevocable letter of separation, permanently waiving their right to grieve or arbitrate the terms of their own exit.
- Regional supplement violations: The UPS Teamsters Central Region Supplement — one of 44 regional supplements to the National Master Agreement — explicitly restricts UPS from offering incentive programs not voted on and approved by employees and the union.
- Lack of notice and information: UPS failed to provide the information the union is entitled to request before any program affecting employment status is rolled out.
In its emergency filing, the union also argued that the DCP would do irreparable damage to the Teamsters’ institutional right to representation. Once drivers signed the irrevocable separation letter, no arbitration award could undo their resignation or restore their union membership rights. Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien stated: “We’ve given too much to grow and sustain this company, and we will not be sold short. UPS must dismantle its illegal buyout program and resolve its contract violations in the courts, or the Teamsters will see this greedy corporation in the streets.”
February 23, 2026 — Judge Denies Restraining Order
Chief U.S. District Judge Denise J. Casper denied the Teamsters’ motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on February 23, 2026. The ruling turned on the standard for labor injunctions, which courts grant only rarely.
Judge Casper found that the Teamsters had not shown irreparable harm sufficient to justify a judicial injunction. The key issue: the National Master Agreement contains a binding arbitration clause, and an arbitrator could award an adequate remedy — potentially ordering UPS to reinstate drivers or pay damages — if the DCP was found to violate the contract. The judge added that workers who accepted the buyout and resigned before arbitration would lose their jobs regardless, but that was not a basis for a labor injunction when arbitration remained available. The court also noted that cases warranting labor injunctions are rare, and the Teamsters’ case did not cross that threshold.
UPS had separately argued that any dispute should be resolved through arbitration as provided in the contract, not federal court. The judge’s ruling effectively agreed with that framing. The same federal court in Illinois had previously denied a Teamsters local’s request for an injunction against the 2025 DVSP on similar grounds.
March 24, 2026 — UPS Withdraws DCP From 13 States After Central Region Grievances
Despite winning in court, UPS faced escalating pressure through the grievance process. More than 30 local unions in the Central Region — covering states including Michigan, Illinois, and Kentucky — filed local grievances arguing that the DCP violated the UPS Teamsters Central Region Supplement’s specific language barring UPS from directly offering incentive programs that had not been approved by an employee and union vote.
On March 24, 2026, the Teamsters announced that UPS had admitted the DCP violated the Teamsters contract in the Central Region and had withdrawn the buyout program from 13 states where opposition was strongest. The Teamsters’ General Secretary-Treasurer Fred Zuckerman stated: “UPS’s actions to walk away from its own buyout program is an admission of guilt, plain and simple. UPS wants to offload as many well-paid drivers as possible to boost its corporate earnings.” At this point, UPS had still never disclosed how many driver positions it hoped to eliminate through the DCP, but the program’s flat $150,000 offer to all 105,000 eligible drivers suggested the company was hoping for a substantially higher take rate than the 2.6% achieved under the DVSP.
April 5, 2026 — Teamsters and UPS Reach Settlement
After weeks of negotiating in the wake of the partial withdrawal, UPS and the Teamsters National Negotiating Committee reached a settlement on April 5, 2026. The agreement resolved the immediate dispute over the Driver Choice Program and set terms for how it would proceed.
| Term | Detail |
|---|---|
| National cap on buyouts | Maximum 7,500 drivers may receive buyout payments under the DCP across all national job classifications |
| Payment amount | $150,000 per driver |
| Eligible drivers | Full-time package car drivers and long-haul feeder drivers |
| Seniority rule | Applications approved based on seniority and business need; senior drivers have right of first refusal |
| Geographic scope | Nationwide, including in the 13 Central Region states where the DCP had been withdrawn |
| Moratorium on future programs | UPS agreed not to offer any additional severance program until the National Master Agreement expires in 2028 |
| DVSP arbitration | Grievances over the 2025 DVSP continue to binding arbitration separately, scheduled for May 2026 |
Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien framed the settlement as a win: “UPS never had the contractual right to unilaterally offer driver buyouts, but with enough pressure and member solidarity UPS finally did the right thing by putting its commitments to hardworking Teamsters down in writing.” UPS characterized the agreement as aligned with its original objective and said the DCP had “strong interest across the country.”
May 2026 — Post-Settlement Disputes Emerge
Within weeks of the April settlement, reports emerged from within Teamsters locals that the implementation of the DCP was producing unexpected denials and confusion among drivers who believed they qualified under the seniority framework. Drivers reported allegations of favoritism in approval decisions on Teamsters Facebook groups and other online forums. Labor relations observers noted a gap between what the Teamsters’ public announcement described and what the DCP plan document itself specified. Separately, grievance arbitration over the original 2025 DVSP violations moved forward as scheduled in May 2026, keeping the underlying contract dispute alive even after the DCP settlement.
What the Teamsters Alleged — The Contract Behind the Fight
The legal and labor fight over the UPS driver buyouts is fundamentally a dispute about what the 2023 National Master Agreement allows and prohibits. That contract, which covers approximately 347,000 UPS workers and was ratified in September 2023 after a threatened strike, contains detailed provisions governing how UPS can reduce its workforce, negotiate with employees, and change compensation structures.
The most contested provision involves direct dealing. Under federal labor law and the National Labor Relations Act, once a union is certified as the exclusive bargaining representative of a workforce, an employer cannot negotiate directly with individual workers over terms and conditions of employment — including separation. The Teamsters argued that the DCP’s structure, which asked individual drivers to sign separation letters, accept payment, and waive union rights in a transaction that the union was not party to, constituted direct dealing in violation of both the NLRA and the specific contract language.
The employment security provisions were equally central. The 2023 contract included guarantees about the number of positions UPS would maintain and expand. The Teamsters argued that a program designed to eliminate driver jobs en masse violated those commitments, particularly when UPS had agreed to those guarantees as a core part of the bargained-for exchange in the 2023 negotiations. If UPS could simply pay its way out of those commitments with a buyout program it designed unilaterally, the employment security provisions in the contract would be meaningless.
The irrevocability of the separation letter was a third dimension. A driver who signed and resigned could not subsequently grieve the terms of separation or challenge the process. The Teamsters argued this was designed to cut off any individual driver’s ability to contest the arrangement after the fact — a structural feature of the DCP that compounded the direct dealing problem by eliminating the post-departure remedy the arbitration system would otherwise provide.
What Was at Stake for Drivers Who Accepted
For any individual driver weighing the DCP, the $150,000 figure was the headline — but the fine print carried the real cost of accepting.
- Permanent ban on future UPS employment — acceptance is irrevocable and final
- All future union wages and annual pay increases negotiated under the 2023 contract
- Employer-paid healthcare coverage — one of the highest-value provisions in the Teamsters contract
- Pension accumulation and any future increases to pension benefits
- Seniority protections governing route assignments, scheduling, and layoff order
- The right to grieve, arbitrate, or challenge any aspect of the separation
- Access to union representation in any future employment dispute
For a driver early in a career, the $150,000 flat payment compared unfavorably to the lifetime value of continued Teamsters employment. A full-time UPS driver under the 2023 contract earns a top rate of $49 per hour, with a full benefits package that industry analysts estimate is worth an additional $30 to $40 per hour in value. A driver with 20 years remaining until retirement could be trading hundreds of thousands of dollars in total compensation for a single lump sum. The Teamsters’ campaign against the program focused heavily on this math, urging members to understand the long-term cost before signing anything.
The tax dimension added further complexity. A $150,000 lump sum in a single tax year is fully taxable as ordinary income, potentially pushing a driver into a higher tax bracket and substantially reducing the net take-home. By contrast, pension distributions in retirement are often taxed at lower rates, spread across multiple years, or partially shielded by retirement income tax rules. Many drivers who accepted the 2025 DVSP did so without consulting a financial or tax advisor — a pattern the Teamsters and labor advocates urged workers to avoid with the DCP.
Why UPS Pursued Buyouts and What It Means for the Industry
UPS’s decision to shed Amazon volume and restructure its network was not made lightly. Amazon has been aggressively building its own delivery infrastructure for years, and by 2025 its internal network handled more than 6 billion packages annually in the United States. The company had already become less dependent on UPS and FedEx than in prior years, and UPS’s 2023 labor deal — which raised driver pay significantly in response to a threatened strike — made the company’s cost structure for Amazon’s high-volume, low-margin delivery less competitive.
UPS framed the Amazon reduction as a profitable pivot: by moving away from a customer that drove high volume but thin margins, the company could redirect capacity toward higher-value healthcare logistics, international express, and SMB delivery — areas where UPS commands better pricing. The $3.5 billion in targeted structural cost savings represented the financial case for the transformation.
But the workforce consequences of that strategy were enormous. Reducing volume by more than half for UPS’s largest customer meant tens of thousands of driver hours simply ceased to exist. The voluntary buyout programs were UPS’s attempt to achieve those workforce reductions without mass involuntary layoffs — which would have been harder to execute under the Teamsters contract, more damaging to morale, and potentially more expensive in terms of severance obligations. By framing the DCP as a choice, UPS sought to keep drivers who wanted to stay and pay out those who wanted to leave, while meeting its headcount reduction targets.
The tension with the Teamsters reflected a deeper question that the buyout programs raised about modern labor contracts: when a company’s business fundamentally shifts, who has the right to decide how the resulting workforce reduction happens, and on what terms? UPS believed it could design and implement that reduction unilaterally, offering buyouts as a benefit. The Teamsters believed the answer was determined by the 2023 contract and required negotiation. The April 2026 settlement, which required UPS to put its commitments in writing and cap the program’s scope, represented the Teamsters’ position prevailing on that question, even after the federal court ruling denied them the emergency injunction.
What the 2023 Contract Actually Promised Drivers
The Teamsters’ 2023 National Master Agreement was ratified after the union came within days of calling the first national UPS strike since 1997. The near-strike produced significant gains for workers: top driver pay of $49 per hour, enhanced healthcare contributions, new protections for part-time workers, and employment security provisions that restricted UPS’s ability to use automation or subcontracting to eliminate bargaining unit work.
Those employment security provisions are the ones most directly at issue in the buyout dispute. The contract includes language committing UPS to creating and maintaining certain categories of driving positions. The Teamsters argued that the DCP’s goal of permanently eliminating driver positions conflicted with those commitments — that UPS was using the buyout as a mechanism to hollow out the bargaining unit rather than a genuine voluntary opportunity for drivers who wanted to leave.
The Central Region Supplement’s language prohibiting unapproved incentive programs was a separate and sharper constraint. That regional supplement — one of 44 that supplement the national agreement with region-specific terms — explicitly said UPS could not offer incentive programs to workers without union approval through a vote. When UPS rolled out the DCP in those states without that vote, it was not a close call under the contract language. UPS’s withdrawal from those 13 states in March was effectively a concession that it had no defense to the regional supplement argument.
The use of labor contracts as a check on unilateral corporate restructuring decisions is a recurring theme in major labor disputes — the same dynamic played out differently but with similar stakes in the Lexington Law lawsuit, where a company’s unilateral financial practices ran up against established rules and produced a $2.7 billion reckoning.
What This Lawsuit Teaches Consumers
The UPS driver buyouts fight is a case study in what union contracts are actually for and why the details matter. The 2023 National Master Agreement was not a vague statement of good intentions. It was a specific, legally binding set of commitments negotiated under the threat of the largest package delivery strike in American history. Employment security provisions, seniority protections, consultation requirements, regional supplement terms: these were the price UPS paid for labor peace in 2023. The DCP was an attempt to walk those commitments back through a mechanism UPS designed unilaterally when business conditions changed.
The federal court’s decision not to issue an injunction was not a ruling that the DCP was legal. It was a ruling that the Teamsters had an adequate remedy through arbitration and hadn’t met the narrow standard for a labor injunction. That distinction mattered: the union continued fighting through grievances, forced a 13-state withdrawal, and extracted a settlement that capped the program’s scope and protected seniority. The combination of federal litigation, formal grievances, and rank-and-file resistance — including the Central Region’s local unions filing dozens of separate grievances — produced an outcome the court ruling alone did not.
For any worker, union or non-union, the UPS case offers a concrete lesson about buyout programs. A voluntary separation is only as good as the full picture of what you are giving up. UPS offered $150,000 at a moment when drivers were anxious about job security amid network restructuring. But the drivers who declined, stayed on, and let the union fight were the ones who ultimately shaped the terms — a 7,500-driver cap, seniority-based selection, and a moratorium on future programs through 2028. The workers who took the first DVSP offer at $1,800 per year of service got a fraction of what a 30-year driver could have received. The ones who burned the letter and waited got a better deal from a company that knew it still needed drivers to deliver packages.
The broader labor question the UPS case raises — whether a company can use voluntary buyouts as a de facto instrument of collective bargaining avoidance — remains unresolved. The May 2026 DVSP arbitration will address the 2025 violations, and whatever that arbitrator decides will set a precedent for how far UPS can go in future restructuring without returning to the bargaining table, similar in principle to the way the DOT non-domiciled CDL lawsuit forced the question of what procedural shortcuts an agency can take before a court steps in.
Read These
- DOT non-domiciled CDL lawsuit
- Linglong Wei MSU lawsuit
- Food stamps sugary drinks lawsuit
- 23andMe data breach lawsuit
- Rockland County election lawsuit
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the UPS driver buyouts Teamsters lawsuit?
The Teamsters sued UPS in February 2026 to block the Driver Choice Program, a $150,000 voluntary buyout offered to 105,000 full-time drivers without union consultation. The union alleged at least six violations of the 2023 National Master Agreement, including direct dealing with workers and elimination of union jobs. A federal judge denied the injunction, but Teamster grievances forced UPS to withdraw the program in 13 states and ultimately negotiate a settlement.
What was UPS’s Driver Choice Program (DCP)?
The Driver Choice Program was a $150,000 flat lump-sum payment offered to all 105,000 eligible full-time UPS package car drivers and long-haul feeder drivers in exchange for resigning permanently, waiving all union representation rights, and signing an irrevocable separation letter. UPS announced it on January 27, 2026, without notifying the Teamsters union in advance.
What was the first UPS driver buyout — the DVSP?
The Driver Voluntary Separation Program, announced July 18, 2025, was UPS’s first driver buyout. It offered $1,800 per year of service with a minimum of $10,000, available to drivers with at least 25 years of service. Roughly 3,000 of 115,000 eligible drivers accepted — under 3% — with many drivers publicly shredding or burning the offer letters. Grievances over DVSP violations are proceeding to binding arbitration in May 2026.
What did the federal court decide in the Teamsters lawsuit?
Chief U.S. District Judge Denise J. Casper of the District of Massachusetts denied the Teamsters’ request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on February 23, 2026. She found the union had not shown irreparable harm because the contract’s arbitration process could provide an adequate remedy. The court noted that labor injunctions are rarely warranted and this case did not meet that high standard.
What was the April 2026 settlement between UPS and the Teamsters?
On April 5, 2026, UPS and the Teamsters National Negotiating Committee agreed to cap the Driver Choice Program at 7,500 drivers nationwide, require that approvals be based on seniority, extend the program to all states including the 13 Central Region states where it had been withdrawn, and commit UPS to no additional severance programs before the National Master Agreement expires in 2028.
Why did UPS pull the Driver Choice Program from 13 states in March 2026?
Over 30 Teamsters local unions in the Central Region filed grievances citing UPS Teamsters Central Region Supplement language that explicitly prohibits UPS from offering incentive programs not approved by an employee and union vote. UPS withdrew the DCP from those 13 states on March 24, 2026, in what the Teamsters characterized as an admission that the program violated the contract in that region.
What does a UPS driver give up by accepting the $150,000 buyout?
A driver accepting the DCP permanently forfeits employment at UPS, all future union wages and annual pay increases, employer-paid healthcare coverage, pension accumulation, seniority protections, and the right to grieve or arbitrate any aspect of the separation. The $150,000 is also fully taxable as ordinary income in the year it is received, which can significantly reduce the net amount after federal and state taxes.
Why is UPS cutting so many driver positions?
UPS made a strategic decision to reduce its delivery volume for Amazon by more than 50% by the second half of 2026, exiting a high-volume but low-margin business in favor of healthcare logistics, international express, and small business delivery. This required closing facilities, reducing fleet size, and eliminating tens of thousands of driving positions whose workload was tied to Amazon volume. UPS targeted $3.5 billion in structural cost savings from the restructuring.
What are the six contract violations the Teamsters alleged against UPS?
The six alleged National Master Agreement violations were: (1) direct dealing with workers by negotiating separation terms outside collective bargaining; (2) eliminating union jobs when the contract required maintaining certain positions; (3) eroding shop steward rights and privileges; (4) requiring irrevocable separation letters that strip drivers of grievance rights; (5) violating the Central Region Supplement’s prohibition on unapproved incentive programs; and (6) failing to provide required information and documents before rolling out a program affecting employment status.
What is the difference between a labor grievance and a federal lawsuit in this dispute?
A federal lawsuit asks a court to issue an injunction stopping UPS from proceeding with the program. A grievance uses the dispute resolution process built into the labor contract, leading to binding arbitration where an arbitrator decides if a contract violation occurred and orders a remedy. The Teamsters pursued both simultaneously. The federal court denied the injunction; the grievance process forced UPS’s Central Region withdrawal and ultimately produced the settlement. DVSP grievances proceed separately to arbitration in May 2026.
Could UPS offer another driver buyout program before the contract expires?
Under the April 2026 settlement, UPS agreed not to offer any additional driver severance program until the National Master Agreement expires in 2028. After 2028, the parties will need to negotiate whether and how future separation programs can be offered during the next contract negotiation.
What happens to drivers who accepted the DCP — can they reverse the decision?
No. The DCP separation letter is irrevocable. Drivers who accepted and resigned permanently forfeited their UPS employment and union representation. The Teamsters specifically argued this irrevocability was one of the DCP’s most harmful features, as it prevented drivers from later challenging the terms through arbitration or grievance procedures after the April settlement changed those terms.
Leave a Reply